A location that had closed was still being billed for service after it shut.
The charge appears on the invoice, and the client confirmed the site was closed.
Things that turned out to be true on real engagements. Each one carries the grade that says how well it is evidenced and what that grade rests on. This is not a list of case studies and it is not a savings claim.
NarrowGateX is the Technology Intelligence Platform: software, AI workers and an accountable advisor.
A location that had closed was still being billed for service after it shut.
The charge appears on the invoice, and the client confirmed the site was closed.
The same service was billed twice at one site, and one of the two was not in use.
Both charges appear on the invoice for the same address, and the client confirmed only one was in use.
Monthly billing increased and no one on the client side noticed it happen.
Invoice-to-invoice comparison across consecutive months.
Invoices carried fees the contract did not provide for, and the provider removed them once the discrepancy was raised.
The invoice line items reconciled against the executed contract, which named no such fees.
Services split across multiple vendors were costing more than a consolidated estate at higher speeds and stronger service levels.
Contracted rates before and after consolidation. The comparison rests on the consolidated estate that replaced it, not on a market benchmark taken at the time.
The incumbent's renewal rate was not the best rate the incumbent would give.
The signed renewal against the prior contract, same provider, same services. What the rate would have been without the negotiation is not documented.
Client names never appear here. Sector and rough size are given only where they help you judge whether a finding applies to you.
Every finding carries one of five grades. How the NGX Evidence Standard works.